Usurping Authority
1 Timothy 2:12 says, “But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.” In the Greek the words “to usurp authority over” are translated from one word—authenteo. It means to dominate or to have authority over. The connotation of “usurp” is to take what is not given, to take hold of what is not yours to have. This connotation—to take what is not yours—is not necessarily implied in this passage. The ASV translates it as, “to have dominion over.” The ESV says, “to exercise authority over.” The NKJV translates it as, “to have authority over.”
The Greek word for “nor” in the above passage is “oude.” This is a very strong negative. Strong’s Dictionary includes the phrases “never” and “not (even so much as)” as meanings for this word. Paul wanted everyone to be clear on this point.
Then he gave the reason: “For Adam was formed first, then Eve” (1 Timothy 2:13).
Faithful men and women whose desire is to please God would never consider elevating a woman to a position of authority over the men in the church. Yet there are other areas where in our service to God in which some may not always be so diligent. Consider the following items as you meditate about this subject.
Consider the issue of withdrawing of our social fellowship from one who is walking disorderly and will not repent. When the elders have exhausted their influence and resources and announce to the congregation that a brother or sister has been withdrawn from as far as social fellowship is concerned, do you sometimes usurp the authority of the elders as well as the commandment of God by having social fellowship with this person? (I am not talking about a spouse. That is a different matter.) But if you engage in social fellowship with a friend or even a child (living outside the home) who has been disfellowshipped are you not usurping the authority of the elders and of God by such actions? (See 2 Thessalonians 3:6.)
Another area where some have perhaps not clearly understood this principle is seen when a person disagrees with the elders in some matter so they withhold their financial contribution. If the elders are making decisions that are unscriptural then the proper way to deal with the situation is to meet with the elders and ask them about these unscriptural practices, and if they do not have scriptural justification or repent of the unscriptural practice then you have no choice but to move your membership to a faithful congregation. But if you are upset with the elders or leaders of the church for a decision that is within their authority to make, then to withhold your contribution, or send it to another church or work in protest is to usurp the authority of the elders which God has given to them (Acts 20:28-30; 1 Peter 5:1-7). You are not punishing the elders. You are disobeying God when you fail to financially support the congregation where you are a member (1 Corinthians 16:1-2).
Another way that authority is usurped is when the elders make a decision and you get your feelings hurt because your idea was not incorporated into the plan. Therefore you decide that you will not be involved with this or other good works of the church. Remember that the elders must watch out for the entire flock. A lot of people have a lot of good ideas that they present to the elders. The elders must weigh these ideas and consider what will be the most expedient for and in the best interest of the entire congregation. Their final question on all their decisions is this, “What will be best for the church.”
It is not sinful to question elders concerning their decisions. It is wrong to disrespect and disobey the elders for exercising the authority which God has placed into their hands (Ephesians 4:11-12). Hebrews 13:17 says, “Obey those [elders] who rule over you, and be submissive, for they watch out for your souls, as those who must give account. Let them do so with joy and not with grief, for that would be unprofitable for you.”
March 31, 2010
|
Posted by admin
Categories: